Comment on "Statistical Modeling: The Two Cultures" by Leo Breiman
Matteo Bonvini, Alan Mishler, Edward H. Kennedy

TL;DR
This paper discusses the influence of different modeling approaches on causal inference, highlighting issues related to model complexity, estimation methods, and cultural divisions in the field.
Contribution
It provides a critical commentary on the impact of modeling choices in causal inference, expanding on Breiman's two cultures concept.
Findings
Model complexity affects causal interpretation
Plug-in vs targeted estimation trade-offs
Tuning flexible causal estimators is challenging
Abstract
Motivated by Breiman's rousing 2001 paper on the "two cultures" in statistics, we consider the role that different modeling approaches play in causal inference. We discuss the relationship between model complexity and causal (mis)interpretation, the relative merits of plug-in versus targeted estimation, issues that arise in tuning flexible estimators of causal effects, and some outstanding cultural divisions in causal inference.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
