The Josephson-Anderson Relation and the Classical D'Alembert Paradox
Gregory L. Eyink

TL;DR
This paper generalizes the Josephson-Anderson relation to classical fluids, linking drag power to vorticity flux, and unifies classical and quantum fluid theories to address the D'Alembert paradox and conditions for drag reduction.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed Josephson-Anderson relation for classical incompressible flow, connecting drag power to vorticity flux and extending vortex dynamics theories.
Findings
Exact relation between drag power and vorticity flux.
Extension of Lighthill's vorticity generation theory.
Implications for turbulent drag reduction.
Abstract
Generalizing prior work of P. W. Anderson and E. R. Huggins, we show that a "detailed Josephson-Anderson relation" holds for drag on a finite body held at rest in a classical incompressible fluid flowing with velocity The relation asserts an exact equality between the instantaneous power consumption by the drag, and the vorticity flux across the potential mass current, Here is the flux in the th coordinate direction of the conserved th component of vorticity and the line-integrals over are taken along streamlines of the potential flow solution of the ideal Euler equation, carrying mass flux The results generalize the theories of M. J. Lighthill for flow past a body and, in particular, the steady-state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
