Measuring frequency-dependent selection in culture
Mitchell G. Newberry, Joshua B. Plotkin

TL;DR
This paper develops a maximum-likelihood method to quantify frequency-dependent selection in cultural traits, revealing how popularity cycles and diversity patterns are driven by social conformity and anti-conformity across different cultures.
Contribution
It introduces a novel statistical approach to infer the form of frequency-dependent selection from time series data of cultural traits, applied to names and dog breeds.
Findings
Common names decline by 2%-6% per year; rare names increase by 1%-3%.
Biblical names have a consistent selective advantage across cultures.
Dog breed popularity follows a 1% annual growth pattern, showing boom-bust cycles.
Abstract
Cultural traits such as words, names, decorative styles, and technical standards often assume arbitrary values and are thought to evolve neutrally. But neutral evolution cannot explain why some traits come and go in cycles of popularity while others become entrenched. Here we study frequency-dependent selection (FDS)--where a trait's tendency to be copied depends on its current frequency regardless of the trait value itself. We develop a maximum-likelihood method to infer the precise form of FDS from time series of trait abundance, and we apply the method to data on baby names and pet dog breeds over the last century. We find that the most common names tend to decline by 2%-6% per yr on average; whereas rare names--1 in 10,000 births--tend to increase by 1%-3% per yr. This specific form of negative FDS explains patterns of diversity and replicates across the United States, France,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenetic diversity and population structure · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Language and cultural evolution
