Ground Truths for the Humanities
Yvette Oortwijn, Hein van den Berg, and Arianna Betti
TL;DR
This paper emphasizes the importance of expert-constructed ground truths for accurate data interaction and representation in humanities research, advocating for their role in ensuring fidelity.
Contribution
It highlights the necessity of developing and utilizing expert-constructed ground truths to improve data fidelity in humanities studies.
Findings
Ground truths enhance data accuracy in humanities.
Expert involvement is crucial for reliable data representation.
Promoting ground truths can improve interpretability of humanities data.
Abstract
Ensuring a faithful interaction with data and its representation for humanities can and should depend on expert-constructed ground truths.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Translation Studies and Practices · Law in Society and Culture