Absorption Lines in the 0.91-1.33 $\mu$m Spectra of Red Giants for Measuring Abundances of Mg, Si, Ca, Ti, Cr, and Ni
K. Fukue, N. Matsunaga, S. Kondo, D. Taniguchi, Y. Ikeda, N., Kobayashi, H. Sameshima, S. Hamano, A. Arai, H. Kawakita, C. Yasui, M., Mizumoto, S. Otsubo, K. Takenaka, T. Yoshikawa, T. Tsujimoto

TL;DR
This study identifies and measures absorption lines of key elements in the near-infrared spectra of red giants to improve stellar abundance analysis, comparing line lists and assessing measurement accuracy.
Contribution
It provides a new line list for six elements in the 0.91-1.33 μm range and demonstrates their use in high-resolution spectra for abundance determination.
Findings
Reasonable agreement with literature abundances within 0.2 dex.
Systematic differences of 0.1-0.2 dex between line lists.
Highlighting the importance of microturbulence estimation for precision.
Abstract
Red giants show a large number of absorption lines in both optical and near-infrared wavelengths. Still, the characteristics of the lines in different wave passbands are not necessarily the same. We searched for lines of Mg I, Si I, Ca I, Ti I, Cr I, and Ni I in the z', Y, and J bands (0.91-1.33 m), that are useful for precise abundance analyses, from two different compilations of lines, namely, the third release of Vienna Atomic Line Database (VALD3) and the catalog published by Melendez & Barbuy in 1999 (MB99). We selected sufficiently strong lines that are not severely blended and ended up with 191 lines (165 and 141 lines from VALD3 and MB99, respectively), in total, for the six elements. Combining our line lists with high-resolution (R = 28,000) and high signal-to-noise (higher than 500) spectra taken with the WINERED spectrograph, we measured the abundances of the six…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
