Benchmark test of Black-box optimization using D-Wave quantum annealer

TL;DR

This study benchmarks the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer for black-box optimization tasks, comparing its performance with classical methods like simulated annealing and semidefinite programming, and finds no clear quantum advantage.

Contribution

It provides an empirical evaluation of the D-Wave quantum annealer's effectiveness in black-box optimization using a sparse SK model, highlighting its limitations compared to classical algorithms.

Findings

D-Wave quantum annealer performs similarly to simulated annealing.

Both D-Wave and SA outperform SDP in this benchmark.

No observed quantum advantage in the tested scenarios.

Abstract

In solving optimization problems, objective functions generally need to be minimized or maximized. However, objective functions cannot always be formulated explicitly in a mathematical form for complicated problem settings. Although several regression techniques infer the approximate forms of objective functions, they are at times expensive to evaluate. Optimal points of "black-box" objective functions are computed in such scenarios, while effectively using a small number of clues. Recently, an efficient method by use of inference by sparse prior for a black-box objective function with binary variables has been proposed. In this method, a surrogate model was proposed in the form of a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) problem, and was iteratively solved to obtain the optimal solution of the black-box objective function. In the present study, we employ the D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer, which can solve QUBO by driving the binary variables by quantum fluctuations. The D-Wave 2000Q quantum annealer does not necessarily output the ground state at the end of the protocol due to freezing effect during the process. We investigate effects from the output of the D-Wave quantum annealer in performing black-box optimization. We demonstrate a benchmark test by employing the sparse Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model as the black-box objective function, by introducing a parameter controlling the sparseness of the interaction coefficients. Comparing the results of the D-Wave quantum annealer to those of the simulated annealing (SA) and semidefinite programming (SDP), our results by the D-Wave quantum annealer and SA exhibit superiority in black-box optimization with SDP. On the other hand, we did not find any advantage of the D-Wave quantum annealer over the simulated annealing. As far as in our case, any effects by quantum fluctuation are not found.