TL;DR
This study investigates how the dynamical regime of neural network-controlled agents affects their evolvability, performance, and adaptability, revealing that subcritical regimes often outperform critical ones in simple tasks, but harder tasks favor near-criticality.
Contribution
It demonstrates that evolving agents tend to become subcritical in simple tasks and highlights the importance of initial proximity to criticality for optimal adaptability and performance.
Findings
Subcritical regimes often outperform critical regimes in simple tasks.
Agents near criticality maintain fitness better under environmental changes.
Optimal dynamical regime depends on task difficulty, with harder tasks favoring near-criticality.
Abstract
It has long been hypothesized that operating close to the critical state is beneficial for natural and artificial systems. We test this hypothesis by evolving foraging agents controlled by neural networks that can change the system's dynamical regime throughout evolution. Surprisingly, we find that all populations, regardless of their initial regime, evolve to be subcritical in simple tasks and even strongly subcritical populations can reach comparable performance. We hypothesize that the moderately subcritical regime combines the benefits of generalizability and adaptability brought by closeness to criticality with the stability of the dynamics characteristic for subcritical systems. By a resilience analysis, we find that initially critical agents maintain their fitness level even under environmental changes and degrade slowly with increasing perturbation strength. On the other hand,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
