TL;DR
This study uses advanced statistical methods on Swedish health records to show that unobserved factors, rather than abortion itself, influence mental health and risky behaviors among young women, highlighting the importance of early intervention.
Contribution
It introduces a novel grouped fixed-effects estimator to account for time-varying unobserved heterogeneity in analyzing mental health and risky behaviors related to abortions.
Findings
Unobserved heterogeneity explains mental health differences more than abortion.
Risky health behaviors and mental health are driven by the same unobserved factors.
Early targeting of self-control issues can mitigate future mental health problems.
Abstract
In this paper, we provide causal evidence on abortions and risky health behaviors as determinants of mental health development among young women. Using administrative in- and outpatient records from Sweden, we apply a novel grouped fixed-effects estimator proposed by Bonhomme and Manresa (2015) to allow for time-varying unobserved heterogeneity. We show that the positive association obtained from standard estimators shrinks to zero once we control for grouped time-varying unobserved heterogeneity. We estimate the group-specific profiles of unobserved heterogeneity, which reflect differences in unobserved risk to be diagnosed with a mental health condition. We then analyze mental health development and risky health behaviors other than unwanted pregnancies across groups. Our results suggest that these are determined by the same type of unobserved heterogeneity, which we attribute to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
