Modelling intransitivity in pairwise comparisons with application to baseball data
Jess Spearing, Jonathan Tawn, David Irons, Tim Paulden

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flexible semi-parametric Bayesian model for pairwise comparison data that captures intransitivity and different strategies, improving fit over traditional models like Bradley-Terry, demonstrated on baseball data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel hierarchical model with multiple intransitivity levels and skill groupings, enhancing adaptability and efficiency in modeling complex pairwise comparison data.
Findings
Model outperforms Bradley-Terry in fit
Effective in capturing intransitivity strategies
Demonstrated on baseball data
Abstract
The seminal Bradley-Terry model exhibits transitivity, i.e., the property that the probabilities of player A beating B and B beating C give the probability of A beating C, with these probabilities determined by a skill parameter for each player. Such transitive models do not account for different strategies of play between each pair of players, which gives rise to {\it intransitivity}. Various intransitive parametric models have been proposed but they lack the flexibility to cover the different strategies across players, with the values of intransitivity modelled using O(n) parameters, whilst they are not parsimonious when the intransitivity is simple. We overcome their lack of adaptability by allocating each pair of players to one of a random number of intransitivity levels, each level representing a different strategy. Our novel approach for the skill parameters…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSports Analytics and Performance · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
