Block Length Choice for the Bootstrap of Dependent Panel Data -- a Comment on Choi and Shin (2020)
Lea Wegner, Martin Wendler

TL;DR
This paper discusses how an adaptive block length choice improves the performance of a bootstrap-based change-point test in dependent panel data, challenging previous claims about size distortions.
Contribution
It shows that with proper data-adaptive block length selection, existing tests can better handle mild temporal dependence, reducing size distortions.
Findings
Adaptive block length improves test accuracy
Sharipov et al.'s test handles mild dependence better
Reduces size distortion compared to previous claims
Abstract
Choi and Shin (2020) have constructed a bootstrap-based test for change-points in panels with temporal and and/or cross-sectional dependence. They have compared their test to several other proposed tests. We demonstrate that by an appropriate, data-adaptive choice of the block length, the change-point test by Sharipov, Tewes, Wendler (2016) can at least cope with mild temporal dependence, the size distortion of this test is not as severe as claimed by Choi and Shin (2020).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact · Statistical Methods and Inference
