TL;DR
This paper introduces a privacy-preserving framework for computing process performance indicators (PPIs) that balances data utility with privacy guarantees using differential privacy, validated through experiments and comparisons.
Contribution
It presents a novel framework and data release mechanisms for privacy-aware PPIs based on the PPINOT meta-model, with provable privacy guarantees.
Findings
Framework is feasible for privacy-preserving PPI computation
Trade-offs between data utility and privacy are demonstrated
Comparison shows advantages over traditional privatization approaches
Abstract
Process performance indicators (PPIs) are metrics to quantify the degree with which organizational goals defined based on business processes are fulfilled. They exploit the event logs recorded by information systems during the execution of business processes, thereby providing a basis for process monitoring and subsequent optimization. However, PPIs are often evaluated on processes that involve individuals, which implies an inevitable risk of privacy intrusion. In this paper, we address the demand for privacy protection in the computation of PPIs. We first present a framework that enforces control over the data exploited for process monitoring. We then show how PPIs defined based on the established PPINOT meta-model are instantiated in this framework through a set of data release mechanisms. These mechanisms are designed to provide provable guarantees in terms of differential privacy.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
