Fluence Adaptation for Task-based Dose Optimization in X-ray Phase-Contrast Imaging

TL;DR

This paper introduces an adaptive fluence distribution method for X-ray phase-contrast imaging that reduces radiation dose while maintaining image quality, validated through simulations and experiments showing significant dose savings.

Contribution

It develops an optimal adaptive fluence mechanism based on analytic multi-order moment analysis, challenging the traditional constant fluence approach in phase-stepping XPCI systems.

Findings

Dose reduction of about 20% in simulations

Improved noise performance observed in experiments

Guidelines for parameter ranges in practical applications

Abstract

Purpose: Grating-based imaging (GBI) and edge-illumination (EI) are two promising types of XPCI as the conventional x-ray sources can be directly utilized. For GBI and EI systems, the phase-stepping acquisition with multiple exposures at a constant fluence is usually adopted in the literature. This work, however, attempts to challenge such a constant fluence concept during the phase-stepping process and proposes a fluence adaptation mechanism for dose reduction. Method: Recently, analytic multi-order moment analysis has been proposed to improve the computing efficiency. In these algorithms, multiple contrasts can be calculated by summing together the weighted phase-stepping curves (PSCs) with some kernel functions, which suggests us that the raw data at different steps have different contributions for the noise in retrieved contrasts. Based on analytic retrieval formulas and the Gaussian noise model for detected signals, we derived an optimal adaptive fluence distribution, which is proportional to the absolute weighting kernel functions and the root of original sample PSCs acquired under the constant fluence. Results: To validate our analyses, simulations and experiments are conducted for GBI and EI systems. Simulated results demonstrate that the dose reduction ratio between our proposed fluence distributions and the typical constant one can be about 20% for the phase contrast, which is consistent with our theoretical predictions. Although the experimental noise reduction ratios are a little smaller than the theoretical ones, synthetic and real experiments both observe better noise performance by our proposed method. Our simulated results also give out the effective ranges of the parameters of the PSCs, such as the visibility in GBI, the standard deviation and the mean value in EI, providing a guidance for the use of our proposed approach in practice.