Correlations between H$\alpha$ Equivalent Width and Galaxy Properties at $z = 0.47$: Physical or Selection-driven?
Ali Ahmad Khostovan, Sangeeta Malhotra, James E. Rhoads, Santosh, Harish, Chunyan Jiang, Junxian Wang, Isak Wold, Zhen-Ya Zheng, L. Felipe, Barrientos, Alicia Coughlin, Weida Hu, Leopoldo Infante, Lucia A. Perez, John, Pharo, Francisco Valdes, Alistair R. Walker

TL;DR
This study investigates whether the observed correlation between Hα equivalent width and galaxy properties at z=0.47 is intrinsic or driven by selection biases, revealing that the correlation is physically significant and related to star formation activity.
Contribution
The paper demonstrates that the intrinsic EW-stellar mass relation is physically meaningful and accounts for observed galaxy distributions, highlighting the prevalence of bursty star formation in low-mass galaxies.
Findings
Intrinsic EW correlates with stellar mass as W0 ∝ M^{-0.16±0.03}.
Low-mass galaxies are ~320 times more likely to have EW > 200 Å.
Selection effects alone cannot explain the prevalence of high-EW outliers in low-mass galaxies.
Abstract
The H equivalent width (EW) is an observational proxy for specific star formation rate (sSFR) and a tracer of episodic star-formation activity. Previous assessments show that EW strongly anti-correlates with stellar mass as similar to the sSFR -- stellar mass relation. However, such a correlation may be driven/formed by selection effects. In this study, we investigate how H EWs correlate with galaxy properties and how selection biases could alter such correlations using a narrowband-selected sample of 1572 H emitters from the Ly Galaxies in the Epoch of Reionization (LAGER) survey. The sample covers 3 deg of COSMOS and cMpc. We assume an intrinsic EW distribution to form mock samples of H emitters (HAEs) and propagate the selection criteria to match observations, giving us control on how selection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
