Hypothesis Tests on Rayleigh Wave Radiation Pattern Shapes: A Theoretical Assessment of Idealized Source Screening

TL;DR

This paper develops theoretical hypothesis tests to distinguish symmetric explosion sources from asymmetric faulting sources using Rayleigh wave radiation patterns, quantifying detection power and optimal sensor placement.

Contribution

It introduces generalized maximum likelihood ratio tests for radiation pattern discrimination, accounting for noise, source parameters, and network geometry, providing fundamental physical limits.

Findings

Screening power increases with fault component size relative to noise.

Optimal sensor locations maximize discrimination probability.

Quantifies errors due to crack opening in screening accuracy.

Abstract

Shallow seismic sources excite Rayleigh wave ground motion with azimuthally dependent radiation patterns. We place binary hypothesis tests on theoretical models of such radiation patterns to screen cylindrically symmetric sources (like explosions) from non-symmetric sources (like non-vertical dip-slip, or non-VDS faults). These models for data include sources with several unknown parameters, contaminated by Gaussian noise and embedded in a layered half-space. The generalized maximum likelihood ratio tests that we derive from these data models produce screening statistics and decision rules that depend on measured, noisy ground motion at discrete sensor locations. We explicitly quantify how the screening power of these statistics increase with the size of any dip-slip and strike-slip components of the source, relative to noise (faulting signal strength), and how they vary with network geometry. As applications of our theory, we apply these tests to (1) find optimal sensor locations that maximize the probability of screening non-circular radiation patterns, and (2) invert for the largest non-VDS faulting signal that could be mistakenly attributed to an explosion with damage, at a particular attribution probability. Lastly, we quantify how certain errors that are sourced by opening cracks increase screening rate errors. While such theoretical solutions are ideal and require future validation, they remain important in underground explosion monitoring scenarios because they provide fundamental physical limits on the discrimination power of tests that screen explosive from non-VDS faulting sources.