On Domatic and Total Domatic Numbers of Product Graphs

TL;DR

This paper investigates the bounds of domatic and total domatic numbers in product graphs, providing new bounds, tightness results, and applications to hypercubes, Hamming graphs, and tori.

Contribution

It establishes bounds for domatic and total domatic numbers of Cartesian product graphs, including new bounds for hypercubes, Hamming graphs, and tori, with proofs of tightness and generalizations.

Findings

Bounds for $d(G imes H)$ and $d_t(G imes H)$ in terms of graph sizes and individual numbers.

Tightness of bounds demonstrated for an infinite family of graphs.

New bounds for hypercubes, Hamming graphs, and tori.

Abstract

A \emph{domatic} (\emph{total domatic}) \emph{$k$-coloring} of a graph $G$ is an assignment of $k$ colors to the vertices of $G$ such that each vertex contains vertices of all $k$ colors in its closed neighborhood (neighborhood). The \emph{domatic} (\emph{total domatic}) \emph{number} of $G$, denoted $d(G)$ ($d_t (G)$), is the maximum $k$ for which $G$ has a domatic (total domatic) $k$-coloring. In this paper, we show that for two non-trivial graphs $G$ and $H$, the domatic and total domatic numbers of their Cartesian product $G \cart H$ is bounded above by $\max\{|V(G)|, |V(H)|\}$ and below by $\max\{d(G), d(H)\}$. Both these bounds are tight for an infinite family of graphs. Further, we show that if $H$ is bipartite, then $d_t(G \cart H)$ is bounded below by $2\min\{d_t(G),d_t(H)\}$ and $d(G \cart H)$ is bounded below by $2\min\{d(G),d_t(H)\}$. These bounds give easy proofs for many of the known bounds on the domatic and total domatic numbers of hypercubes \cite{chen,zel4} and the domination and total domination numbers of hypercubes \cite{har,joh} and also give new bounds for Hamming graphs. We also obtain the domatic (total domatic) number and domination (total domination) number of $n$-dimensional torus $\mathop{\cart}\limits_{i=1}^{n} C_{k_i}$ with some suitable conditions to each $k_i$, which turns out to be a generalization of a result due to Gravier \cite{grav2} %[\emph{Total domination number of grid graphs}, Discrete Appl. Math. 121 (2002) 119-128] and give easy proof of a result due to Klav\v{z}ar and Seifter \cite{sand}.