Naive Automated Machine Learning -- A Late Baseline for AutoML
Felix Mohr, Marcel Wever

TL;DR
Naive AutoML is a simple, interpretable baseline that leverages meta-knowledge, often outperforming complex black-box optimization methods in AutoML tasks.
Contribution
The paper introduces Naive AutoML, a straightforward approach that challenges sophisticated AutoML methods by using meta-knowledge and simple assumptions.
Findings
Naive AutoML often outperforms complex black-box solvers.
Naive AutoML offers interpretability and flexibility.
Complex AutoML methods do not always outperform the naive baseline.
Abstract
Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) is the problem of automatically finding the pipeline with the best generalization performance on some given dataset. AutoML has received enormous attention in the last decade and has been addressed with sophisticated black-box optimization techniques such as Bayesian Optimization, Grammar-Based Genetic Algorithms, and tree search algorithms. In contrast to those approaches, we present Naive AutoML, a very simple solution to AutoML that exploits important meta-knowledge about machine learning problems and makes simplifying, yet, effective assumptions to quickly come to high-quality solutions. While Naive AutoML can be considered a baseline for the highly sophisticated black-box solvers, we empirically show that those solvers are not able to outperform Naive AutoML; sometimes the contrary is true. On the other hand, Naive AutoML comes with strong…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Data Classification · Machine Learning and Algorithms · Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
