Neural Network Attribution Methods for Problems in Geoscience: A Novel Synthetic Benchmark Dataset

TL;DR

This paper introduces a synthetic benchmark dataset for evaluating neural network attribution methods in geoscience regression problems, enabling objective assessment of XAI techniques with known ground truth.

Contribution

It presents a novel framework for creating attribution benchmark datasets in geosciences, facilitating more accurate evaluation of XAI methods with known ground truth.

Findings

Generated a large synthetic dataset for geoscience regression problems.

Compared various XAI methods against ground truth to assess performance.

Highlighted the importance of objective benchmarks for model trust and scientific discovery.

Abstract

Despite the increasingly successful application of neural networks to many problems in the geosciences, their complex and nonlinear structure makes the interpretation of their predictions difficult, which limits model trust and does not allow scientists to gain physical insights about the problem at hand. Many different methods have been introduced in the emerging field of eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), which aim at attributing the network s prediction to specific features in the input domain. XAI methods are usually assessed by using benchmark datasets (like MNIST or ImageNet for image classification). However, an objective, theoretically derived ground truth for the attribution is lacking for most of these datasets, making the assessment of XAI in many cases subjective. Also, benchmark datasets specifically designed for problems in geosciences are rare. Here, we provide a framework, based on the use of additively separable functions, to generate attribution benchmark datasets for regression problems for which the ground truth of the attribution is known a priori. We generate a large benchmark dataset and train a fully connected network to learn the underlying function that was used for simulation. We then compare estimated heatmaps from different XAI methods to the ground truth in order to identify examples where specific XAI methods perform well or poorly. We believe that attribution benchmarks as the ones introduced herein are of great importance for further application of neural networks in the geosciences, and for more objective assessment and accurate implementation of XAI methods, which will increase model trust and assist in discovering new science.