Joint Survey Processing I: Compact oddballs in the COSMOS field -- low-luminosity Quasars at z > 6?
Andreas L. Faisst, Ranga Ram Chary, Sergio Fajardo-Acosta, Roberta, Paladini, Benjamin Rusholme, Nathaniel Stickley, George Helou, John R., Weaver, Gabriel Brammer, Anton M. Koekemoer, Hironao Miyatake

TL;DR
This study combines ground and space-based data to identify faint, high-redshift quasars in the COSMOS field, providing insights into their role in cosmic reionization and galaxy formation.
Contribution
It introduces a pixel-level joint processing method to create a deconfused catalog, enabling the identification of low-luminosity z>6 quasar candidates with improved accuracy.
Findings
Identified 12 low-luminosity z>6 quasar candidates.
Constraints suggest quasars contribute negligibly to reionization.
Method improves separation of quasars from stars and galaxies.
Abstract
The faint-end slope of the quasar luminosity function at z~6 and its implication on the role of quasars in reionizing the intergalactic medium at early times has been an outstanding problem for some time. The identification of faint high-redshift quasars with luminosities of <1e44.5 erg/s is challenging. They are rare (few per square-degree) and the separation of these unresolved quasars from late-type stars and compact star-forming galaxies is difficult from ground-based observations alone. In addition, source confusion becomes significant at >25mag, with 30% of sources having their flux contaminated by foreground objects when the seeing resolution is ~0.7". We mitigate these issues by performing a pixel-level joint processing of ground and space-based data from Subaru/HSC and HST/ACS. We create a deconfused catalog over the 1.64 square-degrees of the COSMOS field, after accounting for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
