Where Did the Outskirts Go? Outer Stellar Haloes as a Sensitive Probe of Supernova Feedback
B.W. Keller

TL;DR
This study shows that the discrepancy between simulated and observed stellar halo outskirts can be resolved by adopting a physically-motivated supernova feedback model, which better regulates star formation in low-mass progenitors.
Contribution
It demonstrates that using a new supernova feedback model in simulations aligns stellar halo outskirts with observations, resolving previous tensions.
Findings
Older feedback models overpredict stellar halo outskirts.
New 'superbubble' feedback model reduces outskirts surface densities.
Simulations with the new model match observed stellar halo profiles.
Abstract
A recent comparison by Merritt et al. 2020 of simulated and observed Milky Way-mass galaxies has identified a significant tension between the outskirts () of the stellar halos in simulated and observed galaxies. Using observations from the Dragonfly telescope and simulated galaxies from the Illustris-TNG100 project, Merritt et al. 2020 finds that the outskirts of stellar halos in simulated galaxies have surface densities dex higher than observed galaxies. In this paper, we compare two suites of 15 simulated Milky Way-like galaxies, each drawn from the same initial conditions, simulated with the same hydrodynamical code, but with two different models for feedback from supernovae. We find that the MUGS simulations, which use an older ``delayed-cooling'' model for feedback, also produce too much stellar mass in the outskirts of the halo, with median surface densities well…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
