Measurement of the Beam-Normal Single-Spin Asymmetry for Elastic Electron Scattering from $^{12}$C and $^{27}$Al
QWeak Collaboration: D. Androic, D.S. Armstrong, A. Asaturyan, K., Bartlett, R.S. Beminiwattha, J. Benesch, F. Benmokhtar, J. Birchall, R.D., Carlini, M.E. Christy, J.C. Cornejo, S. Covrig Dusa, M.M. Dalton, C.A. Davis,, W. Deconinck, J.F. Dowd, J.A. Dunne, D. Dutta, W.S. Duvall

TL;DR
This paper reports measurements of the beam-normal single-spin asymmetry in elastic electron scattering from carbon-12 and aluminum-27, providing new data at specific kinematics and comparing results with theoretical models and previous experiments.
Contribution
It presents the first measurement of $B_n$ on $^{27}$Al and adds new data points for $^{12}$C, enhancing understanding of asymmetries in elastic electron scattering at forward angles.
Findings
Measured $B_n$ asymmetries: -10.68 ppm for $^{12}$C and -12.16 ppm for $^{27}$Al.
Results are consistent with theoretical predictions.
Q-dependence of asymmetries follows a common slope across different nuclei.
Abstract
We report measurements of the parity-conserving beam-normal single-spin elastic scattering asymmetries on C and Al, obtained with an electron beam polarized transverse to its momentum direction. These measurements add an additional kinematic point to a series of previous measurements of on C and provide a first measurement on Al. The experiment utilized the Qweak apparatus at Jefferson Lab with a beam energy of 1.158 GeV. The average lab scattering angle for both targets was 7.7 degrees, and the average for both targets was 0.02437 GeV (Q=0.1561 GeV). The asymmetries are = -10.68 0.90 stat) 0.57 (syst) ppm for C and = -12.16 0.58 (stat) 0.62 (syst) ppm for Al. The results are consistent with theoretical predictions, and are compared to existing data. When scaled by Z/A, the Q-dependence…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
