The Old and the New: Can Physics-Informed Deep-Learning Replace Traditional Linear Solvers?
Stefano Markidis

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the potential of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) as linear solvers for PDEs, particularly the Poisson equation, and proposes hybrid methods combining PINNs with traditional solvers to improve accuracy and performance.
Contribution
The study characterizes PINN-based linear solvers, highlights their limitations, and introduces hybrid approaches that integrate PINNs with traditional solvers for enhanced efficiency.
Findings
PINNs converge quickly on low-frequency solution components.
High-frequency solutions require extensive training time.
Hybrid PINN-traditional solvers achieve competitive accuracy and performance.
Abstract
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) are neural networks encoding the problem governing equations, such as Partial Differential Equations (PDE), as a part of the neural network. PINNs have emerged as a new essential tool to solve various challenging problems, including computing linear systems arising from PDEs, a task for which several traditional methods exist. In this work, we focus first on evaluating the potential of PINNs as linear solvers in the case of the Poisson equation, an omnipresent equation in scientific computing. We characterize PINN linear solvers in terms of accuracy and performance under different network configurations (depth, activation functions, input data set distribution). We highlight the critical role of transfer learning. Our results show that low-frequency components of the solution converge quickly as an effect of the F-principle. In contrast, an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
