Free-lattice functors weakly preserve epi-pullbacks
H. Peter Gumm, Ralph Freese

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that free-lattice functors weakly preserve epi-pullbacks by showing that certain equations in lattice terms always originate from a common ancestor term, linking algebraic and category-theoretic perspectives.
Contribution
It establishes a bidirectional correspondence between equations in lattice terms and ancestor terms, and formulates this result as free-lattice functors weakly preserving epi-pullbacks.
Findings
Equations in lattice terms always originate from a common ancestor term.
The result links algebraic unification with category-theoretic properties.
The paper provides a concise categorical formulation of the algebraic result.
Abstract
Suppose and are terms. If there is a common "ancestor" term specializing to and through identifying some variables \begin{align*} p(x,y,z) & \approx s(x,y,z,z)\\ q(x,y,z) & \approx s(x,x,y,z), \end{align*} then the equation \[ p(x,x,z)\approx q(x,z,z) \] is trivially obtained by syntactic unification of with In this note we show that for lattice terms, and more generally for terms of lattice-ordered algebras, the converse is true, too. Given terms and an equation \begin{equation} p(u_{1},\ldots,u_{m})\approx q(v_{1},\ldots,v_{n})\label{eq:p_eq_q} \end{equation} where there is always an "ancestor term" such that and arise as substitution instances of whose unification…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Rings, Modules, and Algebras · Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
