Towards Few-Shot Fact-Checking via Perplexity
Nayeon Lee, Yejin Bang, Andrea Madotto, Madian Khabsa, Pascale Fung

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel few-shot fact-checking approach using perplexity scores from large language models, outperforming baselines with minimal training data and providing new datasets.
Contribution
It proposes a perplexity-based method for few-shot fact-checking, demonstrating strong performance with only two training samples and releasing new COVID-19 fact-checking datasets.
Findings
Outperforms baseline models with just two training samples
Verifies the effectiveness of perplexity scores in fact-checking
Provides publicly available COVID-19 fact-checking datasets
Abstract
Few-shot learning has drawn researchers' attention to overcome the problem of data scarcity. Recently, large pre-trained language models have shown great performance in few-shot learning for various downstream tasks, such as question answering and machine translation. Nevertheless, little exploration has been made to achieve few-shot learning for the fact-checking task. However, fact-checking is an important problem, especially when the amount of information online is growing exponentially every day. In this paper, we propose a new way of utilizing the powerful transfer learning ability of a language model via a perplexity score. The most notable strength of our methodology lies in its capability in few-shot learning. With only two training samples, our methodology can already outperform the Major Class baseline by more than absolute 10% on the F1-Macro metric across multiple datasets.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
