Generic measure preserving transformations and the closed groups they generate
S{\l}awomir Solecki

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that for a generic measure preserving transformation, the generated closed group is not isomorphic to a specific topological group of measurable functions, answering a question posed by Glasner and Weiss.
Contribution
It establishes a new spectral property of Koopman representations for generic transformations, distinguishing their generated groups from the group of all measurable functions.
Findings
The closed group generated by a generic measure preserving transformation is not isomorphic to L^0(λ, T).
Koopman representations of ergodic boolean actions have unique spectral properties.
The result answers a previously open question by Glasner and Weiss.
Abstract
We show that, for a generic measure preserving transformation , the closed group generated by is not isomorphic to the topological group of all Lebesgue measurable functions from to (taken with pointwise multiplication and the topology of convergence in measure). This result answers a question of Glasner and Weiss. The main step in the proof consists of showing that Koopman representations of ergodic boolean actions of possess a non-trivial spectral property not shared by all unitary representations of . The main tool underlying our arguments is a theorem on the form of unitary representations of from our earlier work.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical Dynamics and Fractals · Topological and Geometric Data Analysis · Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
