Concentrated Lunar Resources: Imminent Implications for Governance and Justice
Martin Elvis, Alanna Krolikowski, Tony Milligan

TL;DR
The paper discusses the imminent risks of crowding and interference at key lunar sites of scientific, resource, and settlement interest, emphasizing the need for proactive governance to prevent conflicts and preserve opportunities.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of potential conflicts at lunar sites and proposes governance and ethical frameworks based on Earth analogs to manage lunar resource utilization.
Findings
Multiple lunar sites face crowding risks from diverse missions.
Interference among actors could lead to significant opportunity losses.
Legal and ethical considerations are crucial for sustainable lunar exploration.
Abstract
Numerous missions planned for the next decade are likely to target a handful of smal sites of interest on the Moon's surface, creating risks of crowding and interference at these locations. The Moon presents finite and scarce areas with rare topography or concentrations of resources of special value. Locations of interest to science, notably for astronomy, include the Peaks of Eternal Light, the coldest of the cold traps and smooth areas on the far side. Regions richest in physical resources could also be uniquely suited to settlement and commerce. Such sites of interest are both few and small. Typically, there are fewer than ten key sites of each type, each site spanning a few kilometres across. We survey the implications for different kins of mission and find that the diverse actors pursuing incomptible ends at these sites could soon crowd and interfere with each other, leaving almost…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
