Gravitational effects in macroscopic quantum systems: a first-principles analysis
Charis Anastopoulos, Mihalis Lagouvardos, Konstantina Savvidou

TL;DR
This paper investigates the weak-field limit of general relativity combined with quantum matter, revealing that certain proposed gravitational quantum phenomena do not involve true gravitational degrees of freedom and emphasizing the importance of a consistent quantisation approach.
Contribution
It provides a first-principles analysis of gravitational effects in macroscopic quantum systems, highlighting the nature of weak gravity as a parameterised field theory and discussing quantisation ambiguities.
Findings
Proposed gravitational quantum phenomena lack true gravitational degrees of freedom.
Weak gravity with matter is a parameterised field theory, not full GR.
Gauge-fixing quantisation introduces gauge dependence and the problem of time.
Abstract
We analyze the weak-field limit of General Relativity with matter and its possible quantisations. This analysis aims towards a predictive quantum theory to provide a first-principles description of gravitational effects in macroscopic quantum systems. This includes recently proposed experiments on the generation of (Newtonian) gravitational forces from quantum distributions of matter, and phenomena like gravity-induced entanglement, gravitational cat states, gravity-induced Rabi oscillations, and quantum causal orderings of events. Our main results include: (i) The demonstration that these phenomena do not involve true gravitational degrees of freedom. (ii) We show that, unlike full general relativity, weak gravity with matter is a parameterised field theory, i.e., a theory obtained by promoting spacetime coordinates to `dynamical' variables. (iii) Quantisation via gauge-fixing leads to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
