Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Survey
Hongsheng Hu, Zoran Salcic, Lichao Sun, Gillian Dobbie and, Philip S. Yu, Xuyun Zhang

TL;DR
This survey comprehensively reviews membership inference attacks and defenses in machine learning, highlighting their types, challenges, and future research directions to address privacy vulnerabilities.
Contribution
First systematic survey on ML membership inference attacks and defenses, providing taxonomies, analysis, and future research directions.
Findings
Identified various attack and defense methods with their pros and cons.
Highlighted gaps and challenges in current MIA research.
Provided a resource repository for ongoing research.
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) models have been widely applied to various applications, including image classification, text generation, audio recognition, and graph data analysis. However, recent studies have shown that ML models are vulnerable to membership inference attacks (MIAs), which aim to infer whether a data record was used to train a target model or not. MIAs on ML models can directly lead to a privacy breach. For example, via identifying the fact that a clinical record that has been used to train a model associated with a certain disease, an attacker can infer that the owner of the clinical record has the disease with a high chance. In recent years, MIAs have been shown to be effective on various ML models, e.g., classification models and generative models. Meanwhile, many defense methods have been proposed to mitigate MIAs. Although MIAs on ML models form a newly emerging and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
