The VLA Frontier Field Survey: A Comparison of the Radio and UV/optical size of $0.3 \lesssim z \lesssim 3$ star-forming galaxies
E. F. Jim\'enez-Andrade, E. J. Murphy, I. Heywood, I. Smail, K., Penner, E. Momjian, M. Dickinson, L. Armus, T. J. W. Lazio

TL;DR
This study compares the sizes of star-forming galaxies in radio, UV, and optical wavelengths across redshifts 0.3 to 3, revealing that radio emission is more centrally concentrated and that galaxy sizes grow over time, especially in high-mass, high-SFR galaxies.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of radio, UV, and optical sizes of star-forming galaxies over a broad redshift range, highlighting the central concentration of star formation activity.
Findings
Radio sizes are independent of stellar mass, unlike UV/optical sizes.
High-SFR galaxies have more compact radio, UV, and optical emission.
Galaxy sizes increase by a factor of 1.5-2 from z≈3 to z≈0.3.
Abstract
To investigate the growth history of galaxies, we measure the rest-frame radio, ultraviolet (UV), and optical sizes of 98 radio-selected, star-forming galaxies (SFGs) distributed over and median stellar mass of . We compare the size of galaxy stellar disks, traced by rest-frame optical emission, relative to the overall extent of star formation activity that is traced by radio continuum emission. Galaxies in our sample are identified in three Hubble Frontier Fields: MACSJ0416.12403, MACSJ0717.5+3745, and MACSJ1149.5+2223. Radio continuum sizes are derived from 3 GHz and 6 GHz radio images ('' resolution, noise level) from the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array. Rest-frame UV and optical sizes are derived using observations from the Hubble Space Telescope and the ACS…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
