Building the perfect game -- an empirical study of game modifications
Daniel Lee, Dayi Lin, Cor-Paul Bezemer, Ahmed E. Hassan

TL;DR
This empirical study analyzes 9,521 game mods from Nexus Mods to understand modding community dynamics, revealing that official support and improved bug reporting can enhance mod quality and game longevity.
Contribution
It provides a large-scale quantitative analysis of game mods, offering insights and practical recommendations for developers and platforms to foster active modding communities.
Findings
Official mod support improves perceived mod quality
Users are willing to report bugs but often do so poorly
Enhanced bug reporting systems can increase bug report quality
Abstract
Game developers cannot always meet the growing and changing needs of the gaming community, due to the often already overloaded schedules of developers. So-called modders can potentially assist game developers with addressing gamers' needs. Modders are enthusiasts who provide modifications or completely new content for a game. By supporting modders, game developers can meet the rapidly growing and varying needs of their gamer base. Modders have the potential to play a role in extending the life expectancy of a game, thereby saving game developers time and money, and leading to a better overall gaming experience for their gamer base. In this paper, we empirically study the metadata of 9,521 mods of the 20 most-modded games on the Nexus Mods distribution platform. Our goal is to provide useful insights into the modding community of the Nexus Mods distribution platform from a quantitative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
