Investigating society's educational debts due to racism and sexism in student attitudes about physics using quantitative critical race theory
Jayson Nissen, Ian Her Many Horses, Ben Van Dusen

TL;DR
This study uses quantitative critical race theory to analyze how racism and sexism contribute to disparities in student attitudes about physics, revealing societal educational debts and emphasizing the need for inclusive instructional practices.
Contribution
It applies hierarchical linear modeling to quantify intersecting racial and gender disparities in physics attitudes, highlighting societal educational debts affecting diversity in physics education.
Findings
White students, especially White men in calculus courses, exhibit more expert-like attitudes.
Most student attitudes remained unchanged or slightly declined during courses.
Large disparities exist across race and gender groups, reflecting societal educational debts.
Abstract
The American Physical Society calls on its members to improve the diversity of physics by supporting an inclusive culture that encourages women and Black, Indigenous, and people of color to become physicists. In the current educational system, it is unlikely for a student to become a physicist if they do not share the same attitudes about what it means to learn and do physics as those held by most professional physicists. Evidence shows college physics courses and degree programs do not support students in developing these attitudes. Rather physics education filters out students who do not enter college physics courses with these attitudes. To better understand the role of attitudes in the lack of diversity in physics, we investigated the intersecting relationships between racism and sexism in inequities in student attitudes about learning and doing physics using a critical quantitative…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
