Explainable AI by BAPC -- Before and After correction Parameter Comparison
Florian Sobieczky, Manuela Gei{\ss}

TL;DR
This paper introduces a local surrogate explanation method for AI models, specifically using a residual correction approach with linear regression as the base, analyzing the trade-offs between accuracy and fidelity.
Contribution
It presents a novel analytical framework for explaining AI predictions via residual correction, with criteria linking surrogate accuracy, fidelity, and data noise.
Findings
Criteria for optimal neighborhood size in explanations
Trade-offs between surrogate accuracy and fidelity
Analytical bounds under data noise assumptions
Abstract
A local surrogate for an AI-model correcting a simpler 'base' model is introduced representing an analytical method to yield explanations of AI-predictions. The approach is studied here in the context of the base model being linear regression. The AI-model approximates the residual error of the linear model and the explanations are formulated in terms of the change of the interpretable base model's parameters. Criteria are formulated for the precise relation between lost accuracy of the surrogate, the accuracy of the AI-model, and the surrogate fidelity. It is shown that, assuming a certain maximal amount of noise in the observed data, these criteria induce neighborhoods of the instances to be explained which have an ideal size in terms of maximal accuracy and fidelity.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Machine Learning and Data Classification · Stock Market Forecasting Methods
