A Weakly Supervised Approach for Classifying Stance in Twitter Replies
Sumeet Kumar, Ramon Villa Cox, Matthew Babcock, Kathleen M. Carley

TL;DR
This paper introduces a weakly supervised method for classifying stance in Twitter replies, leveraging hashtags for labeling and outperforming supervised models without needing extensive labeled data.
Contribution
The study presents a novel weakly supervised approach for stance classification that reduces reliance on labeled data by using hashtags for weak labeling.
Findings
Improves mean F1-macro by 8% over supervised models
Creates a new stance dataset with user opinions and stances
Demonstrates effectiveness on COVID-19 Twitter conversations
Abstract
Conversations on social media (SM) are increasingly being used to investigate social issues on the web, such as online harassment and rumor spread. For such issues, a common thread of research uses adversarial reactions, e.g., replies pointing out factual inaccuracies in rumors. Though adversarial reactions are prevalent in online conversations, inferring those adverse views (or stance) from the text in replies is difficult and requires complex natural language processing (NLP) models. Moreover, conventional NLP models for stance mining need labeled data for supervised learning. Getting labeled conversations can itself be challenging as conversations can be on any topic, and topics change over time. These challenges make learning the stance a difficult NLP problem. In this research, we first create a new stance dataset comprised of three different topics by labeling both users'…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
