Perils of Embedding for Quantum Sampling
Jeffrey Marshall, Gianni Mossi, Eleanor G. Rieffel

TL;DR
This paper investigates the limitations of minor embedding in quantum sampling, especially in the transverse-field Ising model, revealing biases and shifts in phase transitions through advanced quantum Monte Carlo simulations.
Contribution
It generalizes previous work by analyzing quantum thermal sampling with non-zero off-diagonal terms and introduces an improved QMC method for larger system simulations.
Findings
Embedding biases affect observable measurements.
Critical point shifts with embedding size.
Sampling probability depends on system parameters.
Abstract
Given quantum hardware that enables sampling from a family of natively implemented Hamiltonians, how well can one use that hardware to sample from a Hamiltonian outside that family? A common approach is to minor embed the desired Hamiltonian in a native Hamiltonian. In Phys. Rev. Research 2, 023020 (2020) it was shown that minor embedding can be detrimental for classical thermal sampling. Here, we generalize these results by considering quantum thermal sampling in the transverse-field Ising model, i.e. sampling a Hamiltonian with non-zero off diagonal terms. To study these systems numerically we introduce a modification to standard cluster update quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) techniques, which allows us to much more efficiently obtain thermal samples of an embedded Hamiltonian, enabling us to simulate systems of much larger sizes and larger transverse-field strengths than would otherwise be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
