After 100 Years, Can We Finally Crack Post's Problem of Tag? A Story of Computational Irreducibility, and More
Stephen Wolfram

TL;DR
This paper investigates Post's problem of tag through empirical, theoretical, and historical analysis, revealing strong computational irreducibility and complex behaviors in tag systems, with implications for understanding computational universality.
Contribution
It provides new evidence of computational irreducibility in tag systems and explores their complex behaviors, connecting historical insights with modern computational theory.
Findings
Strong evidence of computational irreducibility in tag systems
All initial conditions eventually halt, some after over 6*10^11 steps
Identification of minimal complex behaviors including a Collatz-like problem
Abstract
Empirical, theoretical and historical aspects of Post's "problem of tag" from 1921 are explored. Evidence of strong computational irreducibility is found. Despite their deterministic origin, the lengths of successive sequences generated seem to closely approximate random walks. All 10^25 smallest initial conditions are found to eventually halt, although sometimes in > 6*10^11 steps. Implications of the Principle of Computational Equivalence are discussed, along with examples of identifiable computational capabilities of tag systems. Various minimal examples of complex behavior are found, including a less-biased analog of the 3n+1 Collatz problem. There is also discussion of the history of Emil Post and of tag systems in the context of ideas about the foundations of mathematics and computation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
