Chandra and Magellan/FIRE follow-up observations of PSO167-13: an X-ray weak QSO at $z=6.515$
Fabio Vito, William Nielsen Brandt, Federica Ricci, Enrico Congiu,, Thomas Connor, Eduardo Ba\~nados, Franz Erik Bauer, Roberto Gilli, Bin Luo,, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Marco Mignoli, Ohad Shemmer, Cristian Vignali, Francesco, Calura, Andrea Comastri, Roberto Decarli

TL;DR
This study presents follow-up observations of a high-redshift QSO, revealing it to be unusually X-ray weak, with implications for understanding SMBH growth and obscuration in the early universe.
Contribution
First detailed X-ray and spectroscopic follow-up of PSO167-13, establishing its extreme X-ray weakness and potential nuclear winds at z=6.515.
Findings
No significant X-ray emission detected, setting the lowest upper limit for z>6 QSOs.
PSO167-13 is a strong outlier with X-ray emission >6 times weaker than expected.
Possible evidence of nuclear winds from blueshifted emission lines.
Abstract
The discovery of hundreds of QSOs in the first Gyr of the Universe powered by already grown SMBHs challenges our knowledge of SMBH formation. In particular, investigations of QSOs presenting notable properties can provide unique information on the physics of fast SMBH growth in the early universe. We present the results of follow-up observations of the radio-quiet QSO PSO167-13, which is interacting with a close companion galaxy. The PSO167-13 system has been recently proposed to host the first heavily obscured X-ray source at high redshift. We observed PSO167-13 with Chandra/ACIS-S (177 ks), and obtained new spectroscopic observations (7.2 h) with Magellan/FIRE. No significant X-ray emission is detected from the PSO167-13 system, suggesting that the obscured X-ray source previously tentatively detected was either due to a strong background fluctuation or is highly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
