Simultaneous comparisons of treatments versus control (Dunnett-type tests) for location-scale alternatives
Ludwig A. Hothorn

TL;DR
This paper proposes and compares several Dunnett-type tests for simultaneous treatment versus control comparisons, considering both location and scale effects, supported by simulations and real data examples.
Contribution
It introduces new approaches for Dunnett-type tests that simultaneously assess location and scale effects, expanding traditional methods focused only on location.
Findings
New tests perform well in simulations
Real data examples demonstrate practical applicability
R-code implementation provided
Abstract
Commonly, the comparisons of treatment groups versus a control is performed for location effects only where possible scale effects are considered as disturbing. Sometimes scale effects are also relevant, as a kind of early indicator for changes. Here several approaches for Dunnett-type tests for location or scale effects are proposed and compared by a simulation study. Two real data examples are analysed accordingly and the related R-code is available in the Appendix.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Inference
