Weinberg's proposal of 1990: A very personal view
R. Machleidt

TL;DR
This paper reflects on Weinberg's 1990 proposal, revealing through personal experience that it is more practically effective than initially believed, contrary to expectations of its limitations.
Contribution
The authors challenge the perceived limitations of Weinberg's 1990 idea, demonstrating its unexpected practical effectiveness through their analysis.
Findings
Weinberg's idea works better than expected in practice.
Initial assumptions about the limitations of Weinberg's proposal were incorrect.
The study provides a new perspective on Weinberg's 1990 proposal.
Abstract
My personal encounter with Weinberg's proposal of 1990 was a really entertaining one: My collaborator David Entem and I had embarked to show that Weinberg's idea, though smart and beautiful, was essentially useless in practice (like so many of those genius ideas of the 1980s where people claimed to have "derived the nuclear force from QCD"). However, in trying to do so, we showed the opposite; namely, we showed that Weinberg's idea worked better than allowed by any reasonable means.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
