Evidence for differentiation of the most primitive small bodies
B. Carry, P. Vernazza, F. Vachier, M. Neveu, J. Berthier J. Hanus, M., Ferrais, L. Jorda, M. Marsset, M. Viikinkoski, P. Bartczak, R. Behrend, Z., Benkhaldoun, M. Birlan, J. Castillo-Rogez, F. Cipriani, F. Colas, A. Drouard,, G. P. Dudzinski, J. Desmars, C. Dumas, J. Durech

TL;DR
This study provides evidence that the primitive small body Sylvia is differentiated, with a complex internal structure, based on high-resolution imaging, satellite dynamics, and thermal evolution modeling, suggesting diverse formation histories of small Solar System bodies.
Contribution
It offers the first detailed analysis combining shape, satellite dynamics, and thermal modeling to demonstrate Sylvia's differentiation and internal structure.
Findings
Sylvia is a differentiated body with an inhomogeneous internal structure.
Thermal evolution modeling shows partial melting was unavoidable for bodies of Sylvia's size.
Smaller bodies like comets and KBOs likely remained pristine, unlike Sylvia.
Abstract
Dynamical models of Solar System evolution have suggested that P-/D-type volatile-rich asteroids formed in the outer Solar System and may be genetically related to the Jupiter Trojans, the comets and small KBOs. Indeed, their spectral properties resemble that of anhydrous cometary dust. High-angular-resolution images of P-type asteroid (87) Sylvia with VLT/SPHERE were used to reconstruct its 3D shape, and to study the dynamics of its two satellites. We also model Sylvia's thermal evolution. The shape of Sylvia appears flattened and elongated. We derive a volume-equivalent diameter of 271 +/- 5 km, and a low density of 1378 +/- 45 kg.m-3. The two satellites orbit Sylvia on circular, equatorial orbits. The oblateness of Sylvia should imply a detectable nodal precession which contrasts with the fully-Keplerian dynamics of the satellites. This reveals an inhomogeneous internal structure,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
