Continual Developmental Neurosimulation Using Embodied Computational Agents

TL;DR

This paper proposes a developmental, embodied approach to neurosimulation using Braitenberg Vehicles, integrating biological development, plasticity, and learning to create adaptive agents with distinct developmental phases.

Contribution

It introduces developmental Braitenberg Vehicles that evolve through morphogenetic and learning periods, combining genetic algorithms and computational methods for developmental neural network modeling.

Findings

Framework for developmental agent behavior

Use of genetic algorithms for morphogenesis

Integration of embodiment with developmental learning

Abstract

There is much to learn through synthesis of Developmental Biology, Cognitive Science and Computational Modeling. Our path forward involves a design for developmentally-inspired learning agents based on Braitenberg Vehicles. Continual developmental neurosimulation allows us to consider the role of developmental trajectories in bridging the related phenomena of nervous system morphogenesis, developmental learning, and plasticity. Being closely tied to continual learning, our approach is tightly integrated with developmental embodiment, and can be implemented using a type of agent called developmental Braitenberg Vehicles (dBVs). dBVs begin their lives as a set of undefined structures that transform into agent-based systems including a body, sensors, effectors, and nervous system. This phenotype is characterized in terms of developmental timing: with distinct morphogenetic, critical, and acquisition (developmental learning) periods. We further propose that network morphogenesis can be accomplished using a genetic algorithmic approach, while developmental learning can be implemented using a number of computational methodologies. This approach provides a framework for adaptive agent behavior that might result from a developmental approach: namely by exploiting critical periods or growth and acquisition, an explicitly embodied network architecture, and a distinction between the assembly of neuronal networks and active learning on these networks. In conclusion, we will consider agent learning and development at different timescales, from very short (<100ms) intervals to long-term evolution. The development, evolution, and learning in an embodied agent-based approach is key to an integrative view of biologically-inspired intelligence.