Covering versus partitioning with the Cantor space
Will Brian

TL;DR
This paper investigates conditions under which topological spaces can be partitioned into or covered by copies of the Cantor space, establishing cardinality bounds and constructing counterexamples.
Contribution
It proves when covering with copies of the Cantor space implies partitioning, providing sharp bounds and characterizing spaces with no isolated points.
Findings
Partitioning and covering are equivalent under certain cardinality conditions.
Constructed spaces show the bounds are sharp and the conditions are necessary.
A completely metrizable space can be partitioned into Cantor spaces iff it has no isolated points.
Abstract
What topological spaces can be partitioned into copies of the Cantor space ? An obvious necessary condition is that a space can be partitioned into copies of only if it can be covered with copies of . We prove three theorems concerning when this necessary condition is also sufficient. If is a metrizable space and (the least limit cardinal ), then can be partitioned into copies of if and only if can be covered with copies of . To show this cardinality bound is sharp, we construct a metrizable space of size that can be covered with copies of , but not partitioned into copies of . Similarly, if is first countable and , then can be partitioned into copies of if and only if can be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topology and Set Theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology
