Computation of the chemical potential and solubility of amorphous solids
H. A. Vinutha, Daan Frenkel

TL;DR
This paper investigates methods to accurately compute the chemical potential and solubility of amorphous solids using equilibrium and non-equilibrium simulation techniques, highlighting the effectiveness of Jarzynski's method over traditional thermodynamic integration.
Contribution
It introduces a novel application of Jarzynski's non-equilibrium free energy method to estimate chemical potentials in glasses, improving accuracy over standard approaches.
Findings
Jarzynski's method yields chemical potential estimates consistent with supercooled liquid extrapolations.
Thermodynamic integration shows high scatter and overestimates chemical potentials.
Amorphous solubility decreases over time, aligning qualitatively with experimental observations.
Abstract
Using a recently developed technique to estimate the equilibrium free energy of glassy materials, we explore if equilibrium simulation methods can be used to estimate the solubility of amorphous solids. As an illustration, we compute the chemical potentials of the constituent particles of a two-component Kob-Andersen model glass former. To compute the chemical potential for different components, we combine the calculation of the overall free energy of the glass with a calculation of the chemical potential difference of the two components. We find that the standard method to compute chemical potential differences by thermodynamic integration yields not only a wide scatter in the chemical potential values but, more seriously, the average of the thermodynamic integration results is well above the extrapolated value for the supercooled liquid. However, we find that if we compute the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
