Dynamic Pricing and Learning under the Bass Model

TL;DR

This paper introduces a new approach to dynamic pricing under the stochastic Bass model, accounting for demand evolution influenced by pricing, with algorithms that achieve near-optimal regret bounds considering market size.

Contribution

It develops the first regret guarantees for dynamic pricing with demand driven by a stochastic Bass model, highlighting the fundamental role of market size in complexity.

Findings

Proposed an algorithm with regret of order  O(m^{2/3})

Derived a matching lower bound showing optimality of the regret rate

Revealed market size as a key factor in the complexity of demand learning

Abstract

We consider a novel formulation of the dynamic pricing and demand learning problem, where the evolution of demand in response to posted prices is governed by a stochastic variant of the popular Bass model with parameters $\alpha, \beta$ that are linked to the so-called "innovation" and "imitation" effects. Unlike the more commonly used i.i.d. and contextual demand models, in this model the posted price not only affects the demand and the revenue in the current round but also the future evolution of demand, and hence the fraction of potential market size $m$ that can be ultimately captured. In this paper, we consider the more challenging incomplete information problem where dynamic pricing is applied in conjunction with learning the unknown parameters, with the objective of optimizing the cumulative revenues over a given selling horizon of length $T$. Equivalently, the goal is to minimize the regret which measures the revenue loss of the algorithm relative to the optimal expected revenue achievable under the stochastic Bass model with market size $m$ and time horizon $T$. Our main contribution is the development of an algorithm that satisfies a high probability regret guarantee of order $\tilde O(m^{2/3})$; where the market size $m$ is known a priori. Moreover, we show that no algorithm can incur smaller order of loss by deriving a matching lower bound. Unlike most regret analysis results, in the present problem the market size $m$ is the fundamental driver of the complexity; our lower bound in fact, indicates that for any fixed $\alpha, \beta$, most non-trivial instances of the problem have constant $T$ and large $m$. We believe that this insight sets the problem of dynamic pricing under the Bass model apart from the typical i.i.d. setting and multi-armed bandit based models for dynamic pricing, which typically focus only on the asymptotics with respect to time horizon $T$.