TL;DR
This paper introduces deep generative models, focusing on their mathematical foundations, main approaches like NF, VAE, and GAN, and discusses their advantages, limitations, and relation to optimal transport, aiming to motivate further research.
Contribution
It provides a concise mathematical framework for the main types of DGMs and compares their strengths and weaknesses through numerical experiments.
Findings
Normalizing flows offer invertible transformations for density estimation.
VAEs provide a probabilistic approach with latent variables.
GANs generate realistic samples through adversarial training.
Abstract
Deep generative models (DGM) are neural networks with many hidden layers trained to approximate complicated, high-dimensional probability distributions using a large number of samples. When trained successfully, we can use the DGMs to estimate the likelihood of each observation and to create new samples from the underlying distribution. Developing DGMs has become one of the most hotly researched fields in artificial intelligence in recent years. The literature on DGMs has become vast and is growing rapidly. Some advances have even reached the public sphere, for example, the recent successes in generating realistic-looking images, voices, or movies; so-called deep fakes. Despite these successes, several mathematical and practical issues limit the broader use of DGMs: given a specific dataset, it remains challenging to design and train a DGM and even more challenging to find out why a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsNormalizing Flows
