Quantum Bell inequalities from Information Causality -- tight for Macroscopic Locality
Mariami Gachechiladze, Bart{\l}omiej B\k{a}k, Marcin Paw{\l}owski, and, Nikolai Miklin

TL;DR
This paper introduces a family of inequalities derived from Information Causality that approximate quantum correlations in Bell scenarios and demonstrates their strength over Macroscopic Locality in certain cases.
Contribution
It presents a novel set of inequalities based on Information Causality that approximate quantum correlations without assuming quantum formalism, and identifies where these inequalities outperform Macroscopic Locality.
Findings
Derived inequalities approximate quantum correlations for arbitrary settings and outcomes.
Identified a subspace where Information Causality inequalities are necessary and sufficient for Macroscopic Locality.
Showed that Information Causality is strictly stronger than Macroscopic Locality in this subspace.
Abstract
In a Bell test, the set of observed probability distributions complying with the principle of local realism is fully characterized by Bell inequalities. Quantum theory allows for a violation of these inequalities, which is famously regarded as Bell nonlocality. However, finding the maximal degree of this violation is, in general, an undecidable problem. Consequently, no algorithm can be used to derive quantum analogs of Bell inequalities, which would characterize the set of probability distributions allowed by quantum theory. Here we present a family of inequalities, which approximate the set of quantum correlations in Bell scenarios where the number of settings or outcomes can be arbitrary. We derive these inequalities from the principle of Information Causality, and thus, we do not assume the formalism of quantum mechanics. Moreover, we identify a subspace in the correlation space for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
