Looking for Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) in the latest long baseline accelerator neutrino oscillation data
Ushak Rahaman

TL;DR
This study analyzes recent long-baseline neutrino oscillation data from NOvA and T2K to investigate potential Lorentz invariance violation, revealing no definitive evidence but highlighting some tensions and degeneracies.
Contribution
It provides the first combined analysis of NOvA and T2K data considering Lorentz invariance violation, exploring its effects on neutrino oscillation parameters.
Findings
NOvA data cannot distinguish LIV from standard oscillation at 1σ
T2K data and combined analysis exclude standard oscillation at 1σ
LIV introduces degeneracies and alters hierarchy sensitivity
Abstract
In this paper, we have analysed the latest data from NOA and T2K with the Lorentz invariance violation along with the standard oscillation hypothesis. We have found that the NOA data cannot distinguish between the two hypotheses at confidence level. T2K data and the combined data analysis excluded standard oscillation at . All three cases do not have any hierarchy sensitivity when analysed with LIV. There is a mild tension between the two experiments, when analysed with LIV, as at \nova best-fit is at higher octant but the same for T2K is at lower octant. NOA has a new degeneracy over value, when analysed with LIV.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
