Comment on `Relativistic wave-particle duality for spinors'
Carl F. Diether, III, Joy Christian

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent proposal linking relativistic wave-particle duality to Dirac currents, highlighting issues with spin-torsion energy interpretation and rest frame implications, and suggests a possible resolution.
Contribution
It identifies problems in the recent relativistic wave-particle duality proposal and offers a potential way to resolve the identified issues.
Findings
Spin-torsion term should represent negative energy.
The proposed relation implies zero spin-torsion in the fermion's rest frame.
The paper discusses a possible resolution to the identified problems.
Abstract
In a recent paper [1], it has been proposed that relativistic wave-particle duality can be embodied in a relation that shows that the four-velocity of a particle is proportional to the Dirac four-current. In this note we bring out some problems with that idea. In particular, we point out that, in line with existing literature on Einstein-Cartan gravity with torsion, the spin-torsion term should represent negative energy. Moreover, if what is proposed in Eq. (20) of [1] is correct, then the spin torsion term would be zero in the rest frame of the fermion. We suggest a possible resolution of that dilemma.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
