Causal Limit of Neutron Star Maximum Mass in $f(R)$ Gravity in View of GW190814
A.V. Astashenok, S. Capozziello, S.D. Odintsov, V.K. Oikonomou

TL;DR
This paper explores the maximum mass limits of neutron stars within $f(R)$ gravity, considering causal equations of state, and discusses implications for the GW190814 event, suggesting the secondary could be a neutron star, black hole, or rapidly rotating neutron star, but unlikely a strange star.
Contribution
It provides the first numerical analysis of the causal mass limit for neutron stars in $f(R)$ gravity, including effects of variable sound speed and transition density, and discusses implications for GW190814.
Findings
The causal mass limit in $f(R)$ gravity is similar to general relativity, around 3 solar masses.
The secondary of GW190814 is unlikely to be a strange star based on extended gravity considerations.
The maximum neutron star mass in $f(R)$ gravity respects the general relativistic limit, with marginal deviations.
Abstract
We investigate the causal limit of maximum mass for stars in the framework of gravity. We choose a causal equation of state, with variable speed of sound, and with the transition density and pressure corresponding to the SLy equation of state. The transition density is chosen to be equal to twice the saturation density , and also the analysis is performed for the transition density, chosen to be equal to the saturation density . We examine numerically the combined effect of the stiff causal equation of state and of the sound speed on the maximum mass of static neutron stars, in the context of Jordan frame of gravity. This yields the most extreme upper bound for neutron star masses in the context of extended gravity. As we will evince for the case of model, the upper causal mass limit lies within, but not deeply in, the mass-gap…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
