Signaling and Employer Learning with Instruments
Gaurab Aryal, Manudeep Bhuller, Fabian Lange

TL;DR
This paper uses instruments based on Norwegian schooling laws to distinguish private and social returns to education, finding that most productivity gains are private while signaling accounts for a smaller portion.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework distinguishing hidden and transparent instruments to identify private and social returns to education.
Findings
Estimated private return to education is 7.9%.
70% of returns are due to increased productivity.
30% of returns are attributable to signaling.
Abstract
This paper considers the use of instruments to identify and estimate private and social returns to education within a model of employer learning. What an instrument identifies depends on whether it is hidden from, or transparent (i.e., observed) to, the employers. A hidden instrument identifies private returns to education, and a transparent instrument identifies social returns to education. We use variation in compulsory schooling laws across non-central and central municipalities in Norway to, respectively, construct hidden and transparent instruments. We estimate a private return of 7.9%, of which 70% is due to increased productivity and the remaining 30% is due to signaling.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic Policies and Impacts · Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies · Local Government Finance and Decentralization
