The Asymmetry of Antimatter in the Proton
J. Dove, B. Kerns, R. E. McClellan, S. Miyasaka, D. H. Morton, K., Nagai, S. Prasad, F. Sanftl, M. B. C. Scott, A. S. Tadepalli, C. A. Aidala,, J. Arrington, C. Ayuso, C. L. Barker, C. N. Brown, W.C. Chang, A. Chen, D. C., Christian, B. P. Dannowitz, M. Daugherity

TL;DR
This paper presents evidence that the distributions of antimatter quarks inside the proton are asymmetrical, with more down antimatter quarks than up antimatter quarks, challenging previous assumptions of symmetry.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence of antimatter asymmetry in the proton's quark distributions, reviving theories previously considered unlikely.
Findings
More down antimatter quarks than up antimatter quarks over a wide momentum range
Evidence challenges the assumption of antimatter symmetry in the proton
Revives interest in mechanisms explaining antimatter asymmetry
Abstract
The fundamental building blocks of the proton, quarks and gluons, have been known for decades. However, we still have an incomplete theoretical and experimental understanding of how these particles and their dynamics give rise to the quantum bound state of the proton and its physical properties, such as for example its spin. The two up and the single down quarks that comprise the proton in the simplest picture account only for a few percent of the proton mass, the bulk of which is in the form of quark kinetic and potential energy and gluon energy from the strong force. An essential feature of this force, as described by quantum chromodynamics, is its ability to create matter-antimatter quark pairs inside the proton that exist only for a very short time. Their fleeting existence makes the antimatter quarks within protons difficult to study, but their existence is discernible in reactions…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
