Visual Modulation of Human Responses to Support Surface Translation
Mustafa Emre Ak\c{c}ay, Vittorio Lippi, Thomas Mergner

TL;DR
This study explores how different visual conditions affect human postural responses to support surface translations, revealing frequency-dependent effects and modeling the underlying control mechanisms with inverted pendulum models.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of visual influence on postural responses across frequencies and extends existing models to include biomechanical damping effects.
Findings
Visual information increases sway response gain at low frequencies.
Visual cues reduce resonance effects in postural control.
Biomechanical damping influences trunk sway and resonance.
Abstract
Vision is known to improve human postural responses to external perturbations. This study investigates the role of vision for the responses to continuous pseudorandom support surface translations in the body sagittal plane in three visual conditions: with the eyes closed (EC), in stroboscopic illumination (EO/SI; only visual position information) and with eyes open in continuous illumination (EO/CI; position and velocity information) with the room as static visual scene (or the interior of a moving cabin, in some of the trials). In the frequency spectrum of the translation stimulus we distinguished on the basis of the response patterns between a low-frequency, mid-frequency, and high-frequency range (LFR: 0.0165-0.14 Hz; MFR: 0.15-0.57 Hz; HFR: 0.58-2.46 Hz). With EC, subjects' mean sway response gain was very low in the LFR. On average it increased with EO/SI (although not to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
MethodsMeta Face Recognition
